If 2026 was going to be a reset year for the cloud, this week kicked it off with contradictions: investors are bullish on growth, but cloud giants showed strain, and new infrastructure entrants are quietly reshaping capacity and costs.
This Week's 3 Signals (All From This Week Only)
1. Brookfield launches a new cloud business to lease AI compute chips
Brookfield is planning a cloud unit called Radiant that will lease AI chips inside data centers directly to developers, backed by a $10 billion AI infrastructure fund and priority data-center access. This move challenges traditional models from hyperscalers.
Why it matters:
New infrastructure entrants are shifting the battle from just services to ownership of physical compute capacity and energy efficiency. That can reshape pricing and availability for enterprise AI workloads.
Action to be taken:
In Cloudshot, model the impact of alternative compute supply chains on capacity cost curves and supplier risk profiles.
2. Cloud stocks and giants show mixed signals over year-end
As U.S. markets closed for New Year's Day, cloud stocks including Microsoft and Oracle slipped while cloud-focused ETFs showed pressure heading into 2026. This reflects rising investor scrutiny on cloud spending and revenue sustainability.
Why it matters:
Momentum in cloud isn't linear. Even as workloads grow, markets are pricing in cost discipline and execution rather than pure revenue scale.
Action to be taken:
Reconcile your internal forecast with external cost-of-capital expectations; adjust runway planning to reflect tighter spending discipline across major providers.
3. Europe faces strategic cloud sovereignty challenges
Belgium's cybersecurity chief warned that Europe has effectively "lost the internet" due to dependence on U.S. cloud infrastructure, urging coordinated investment to build sovereign capacity.
Why it matters:
Sovereignty and geopolitical risk are now cloud infrastructure variables, not buzzwords. Enterprises with EU footprints may face rising data residency and risk-mitigation costs.
Action to be taken:
Map workloads by regulatory exposure and simulate how sovereignty constraints would affect latency, compliance, and cost in Cloudshot.
💡 Cloudshot Tip of the Week
Treat capacity diversity as a governance signal.
Build a view in Cloudshot that tracks not just which provider you use, but what kind of compute supply chain backs it (traditional hyperscale vs alternative infrastructure).
When price, power, or policy shifts occur, you'll see the risk vector earlier.
🔭 Strategic Signal
2026 started with a tension between new compute supply dynamics and market scrutiny on cost execution.
Investors want growth, but they're also demanding discipline.
At the same time, geopolitical risk (like Europe's cloud sovereignty challenge) is migrating from theory to strategic planning.
Visibility and optionality — not just scale — define resilience today.
⚠️ Before it happens to you…
Model alternative infrastructure supply and sovereignty risk in Cloudshot now, so cost, compliance, and capacity decisions don't show up as surprises later.
Two minutes now.
Months of misaligned roadmaps avoided later.
Sums up updates in 2 mins reading here, Saves hours of reading news.
Subscribe now.